http://www.greenpowerscience.com/
This is the first segment of our half-hour weekly program. Available in HD. Shot with a Canon XH A1.
Are you a person who is interested in green energy and using Solar Energy Panels or creating your own Home Wind Power, then you are just like myself. I have had a keen interest in green energy every since I studied Architecture many many years ago. At that time I learned that is was possible to build homes that are completely self sufficient which was so compelling to me I had to know more.
THIS IS THE FULL VERSION. Solar Training Solar Thermal Training Green Power Green Energy Science.
Duration : 0:5:16
[youtube A_AFnW1bZL8]
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
#1 by johnnyfortner at March 8th, 2010
Its melting cement …
Its melting cement and metal…of course you can stick your hand in it.
#2 by byScrooby at March 8th, 2010
“God: Hidden …
“God: Hidden Science” – Google it!
#3 by jyandow at March 8th, 2010
One of the best …
One of the best videos I’ve seen on the subject.
Thanks for sharing!
#4 by flowerbower at March 8th, 2010
Why are you …
Why are you bothering with solar power, Beamie? I thought that the SEG was going to satisfy all energy needs. Come on, you have to demonstrate 100% faith in the Searl scam, or people will talk.
#5 by mundorganic at March 8th, 2010
@gunnhildtheviking …
@gunnhildtheviking
You’re right, there is no such thing as “free energy”.
#6 by JJANON167 at March 8th, 2010
You don’t even need …
You don’t even need to buy a pricey heliostat, with the proper knowledge and training you can make one thats just hardware. It won’t follow the sun exactly, but it will more-or-less point at it for whatever period of time.
For engineers it would make an interesting distraction on their free time.
#7 by JJANON167 at March 8th, 2010
You sir, are an …
You sir, are an idiot.
1. The energy is coming from the sun, genius. Not ‘nothing’.
2. The highest efficiency ever gained from solar panels is 41%. Commercial quality yields 10-15%.
The rest of that energy becomes heat. Solar thermal energy uses that 100% of energy as heat rather than trying to convert it directly into energy.
Solar thermal is much more efficient, it just has to be harnessed correctly.
#8 by TheWizzooo at March 8th, 2010
Could one use the …
Could one use the sterling engine and battery to charge an electric element that would provide the heat after the sun has set?
#9 by GREENPOWERSCIENCE at March 8th, 2010
@umery2k75 You can …
@umery2k75 You can pass it like a chop but if you pause for a fraction of a second BURN. Not a good idea.
#10 by umery2k75 at March 8th, 2010
What if I put my …
What if I put my hand in the light and instantly remove it.Will I get burn?
#11 by GreenEnergyAble at March 8th, 2010
Nice informational …
Nice informational video.
Please subscribe
-GreenEnergyAble
#12 by 565Customz at March 8th, 2010
can you tell me …
can you tell me what temp your getting at the focal point? i need the temp for a new LARGE stirling engine. im trying to decide between parabolic or freshnel…(i think parabolic is more efficient)
#13 by uneyce at March 8th, 2010
sun position is …
sun position is changin every one minutes. so how do you hold this lens on object all day
#14 by biggpapa226 at March 8th, 2010
I can’t believe …
I can’t believe this flowerbower guy is still around. Get a girlfriend or something man.
#15 by flowerbower at March 8th, 2010
I don’t need to …
I don’t need to confirm anything to the henchman of a crook. And stop trying to seize the moral high-ground; it is far too far a hike from where you are.
#16 by Beamshipcaptain at March 8th, 2010
You are below the …
You are below the level of an Amoeba, flowerbower. Or whoever you are. Probably a vagrant.Since you won’t confirm your identity,, we can only assume the worst.
#17 by gimely67 at March 8th, 2010
lol heleostat costs …
lol heleostat costs them one thousand dollars, when it took us fifty and a day’s worth of work to build one.
#18 by 44103712 at March 8th, 2010
??????????????????? …
????????????????????
?????????????????????
??????????????????????????
????????????????????????
??????????????????
???????????????????????
#19 by TheFucKKKunit at March 8th, 2010
I love you guys
I love you guys
#20 by etereal05 at March 8th, 2010
just for those who …
just for those who DONT get it, FREE energy means, that you WONT have to pay monthly bills for your regular electric consume, it doesnt mean something from nothing, or whatever mumbo-jumbo you like to verbally fight for or against…
#21 by CmdrTobs at March 8th, 2010
“efficient” was …
“efficient” was used in the vaguest way possible there.
Solar energy is very abundant and can work very well in large areas in many parts of the world. ITs a matter of economics why its no used as opposed to fossil fuels.
#22 by DerHaarigePrinz at March 8th, 2010
use the heat of …
use the heat of direct sunlight + heatpumps . as cold potential the coolness of an endothermic saline solution reaction.
#23 by gunnhildtheviking at March 8th, 2010
Makes me laugh all …
Makes me laugh all this talk of free energy lol Physics lesson 101, you dont get more energy out than what you put in. No such thing as free energy. If these fresnel lenses are so great why we still using photovoltaic cells? Maybe cos they still the most efficient source of solar energy collection. How bout we concentrate on redesigning the battery, considering its a over 100 year old design.
#24 by gunnhildtheviking at March 8th, 2010
Yeh lets have …
Yeh lets have massive lenses everywhere. Good idea for mass energy generation in hot countries like australia. Whats the effiency of the engine? And sorry to bust your bubble Beamshipcaptain, but no solar is no where near efficient enough to make it a viable mass energy generation source.
#25 by gekados at March 8th, 2010
WHAT THE are …
WHAT THE are you saying?